Safari vs Opera?

June 14, 2007 on 11:04 am | In Programming | By QBasicer |

Not too long ago, Opera marketed itself as the fastest browser on the market. I did some looking up and found some independant (though possibly not reputable) tests. Here’s one such test. (Google Cache).

On pretty much every platform, Opera was the fastest. I invalidate Konquorer startup times on KDE, as it preloads it for extreme startup times. Check out this page as well. May I also suggest reading this review on IE Safari 3.0 Beta on Win32.

Although, as I’ve mentioned, I haven’t actually looked at Safari, I want to evaluate it for myself.

2 Comments »

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

  1. The following statment is my oppinion, don’t get all butt-hurt if you don’t agree with me.

    I honestly don’t see what the big deal is. Safari is a lame browser. It’s just really bland and featureless.

    Comment by BioHazard — June 14, 2007 #

  2. Personally I don’t really care for it. I just checked it out.

    But it does generate a lot of hits. Hits potentially mean ad traffic. Ad traffic potentially means money. That and I always want to give new technology a testrun. Nothing wrong with that eh? Since Konq ~= KHTML ~= Webkit ~= Safari, I pretty much already knew what it would be like. I never really did like Konq, it has a horrible interface.

    Comment by QBasicer — June 16, 2007 #

Leave a comment

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Powered by WordPress with Pool theme design by Borja Fernandez. I rewrote the CSS because I'm cool like that.
Entries and comments feeds. Valid XHTML and CSS. ^Top^